Where ShipAI.today is stronger than MakerKit
Vector + graph memory layers
BullMQ workers and async jobs
OpenTelemetry tracing baseline
When MakerKit can still be the better fit
Strengths
- · Supabase and Shadcn UI baseline
- · Multi-tenant RBAC support
- · Good starter docs and blog
Best for
Where MakerKit introduces constraints
AI support is template-level
Limited background worker stack
Less observability out of the box
Migration path to ShipAI.today in one focused cycle
Step 1
Recreate RBAC on ShipAI auth helpers
Step 2
Move Supabase data to Postgres
Step 3
Wire AI flows to ShipAI handlers
Decision questions teams ask most
When should I choose MakerKit instead of ShipAI.today?
MakerKit is still a fit when your priorities align with supabase-first teams and your roadmap does not require deeper AI orchestration yet.
Why should I choose ShipAI.today instead of MakerKit?
Choose ShipAI.today when your priority is vector + graph memory layers and you need a faster path to stable execution without heavy platform rewrites.
What is the biggest migration risk?
The primary migration risk is stack realignment from Next.js, Supabase, Shadcn UI, Tailwind, Stripe. Use the switch plan to sequence data, auth, and workflow changes.
How quickly can teams switch?
Most teams can complete the first migration pass in one focused week when they scope to core auth, billing, and workflow routes first.